<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Noisy Dove &#187; attorney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://noisydove.com/tag/attorney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://noisydove.com</link>
	<description>No Nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:04:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Great Article Coming Thursday &#8216;Esquire Dove: Constitutionality Of Obamacare&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://noisydove.com/noisy-dove-economics/great-article-coming-thursday-esquire-dove-constitutionality-of-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://noisydove.com/noisy-dove-economics/great-article-coming-thursday-esquire-dove-constitutionality-of-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 20:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noisy Dove</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[added]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutionality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esquire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everyone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garbage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interstate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pursuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[questionable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisydove.com/?p=2034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be sure to check out Thursday's post here at Noisy Dove for a great article by Esquire Dove on the constitutionality of the new health care reform bill.  There is a lot of discussion of whether it can be repealed or fought in the supreme court.  Our resident expert, an attorney and J.D., has an insiders view from Washington about this hotly debated topic.  Find answers and get new questions on Thursday from this fascinating post.  The information will be invaluable and the insight will get you really thinking.  Remember, Thursday, Esquire Dove will lay it all out for us!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://noisydove.com/wp-content/uploads/Esquire-Dove1.jpg" rel="lightbox[2034]" title="Esquire-Dove"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2038" title="Esquire-Dove" src="http://noisydove.com/wp-content/uploads/Esquire-Dove1.jpg" alt="Esquire-Dove" width="350" height="200" /></a>Be sure to check out Thursday&#8217;s post here at Noisy Dove for a great article by Esquire Dove on the constitutionality of the new health care reform bill.  There is a lot of discussion of whether it can be repealed or fought in the supreme court.  Our resident expert, an attorney and J.D., has an insiders view from Washington about this hotly debated topic.  Find answers and get new questions on Thursday from this fascinating post.  The information will be invaluable and the insight will get you really thinking.  Remember, Thursday, Esquire Dove will lay it all out for us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://noisydove.com/noisy-dove-economics/great-article-coming-thursday-esquire-dove-constitutionality-of-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Litigious, Politically Incorrect?</title>
		<link>http://noisydove.com/noisy-dove-politics/litigious-politically-incorrect/</link>
		<comments>http://noisydove.com/noisy-dove-politics/litigious-politically-incorrect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noisy Dove</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incorrect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insult]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politically]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://noisydove.com/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calling a lawyer litigious is like calling an engineer industrious, or an entrepreneur entrepreneurial, or a doctor inquisitive. Because – like – being litigious means having a tendency to litigate - which is the essential job of a lawyer. So if a lawyer likes their job they probably make lots of money too, which is bad, because everyone who isn’t a stupid right-wing nut-job knows that unless you’re working for the government or in a government program all your wealth is being stolen from the poor. That’s easy enough to see on a percent of national wealth graph.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://noisydove.com/wp-content/uploads/judge-judy.jpg" rel="lightbox[868]" title="judge-judy"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-869" title="judge-judy" src="http://noisydove.com/wp-content/uploads/judge-judy.jpg" alt="judge-judy" width="300" height="220" /></a>Calling a lawyer litigious is like calling an engineer industrious, or an entrepreneur entrepreneurial, or a doctor inquisitive. Because – like – being litigious means having a tendency to litigate &#8211; which is the essential job of a lawyer. So if a lawyer likes their job they probably make lots of money too, which is bad, because everyone who isn’t a stupid right-wing nut-job knows that unless you’re working for the government or in a government program all your wealth is being stolen from the poor. That’s easy enough to see on a percent of national wealth graph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://noisydove.com/noisy-dove-politics/litigious-politically-incorrect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

